BillOReilly.com: The O'Reilly Factor Insider.
Yes, read the article at the NYT, please. Note the following: "There is no evidence that he created the images, made money from them or had any contact with the children." and compare with: "But let me say this: sexually abusing children is like putting a blowtorch to their skin. It scars them emotionally forever. It can easily ruin a child's life."
I.E. the pictures were RECIEVED by the 18 year old, then re-sent, they were not original. What if the originator were a rich, white, male Neocon? Get the whole 'Rush to injustice'?
Yes, read the article at the NYT, please. Note the following: "There is no evidence that he created the images, made money from them or had any contact with the children." and compare with: "But let me say this: sexually abusing children is like putting a blowtorch to their skin. It scars them emotionally forever. It can easily ruin a child's life."
I.E. the pictures were RECIEVED by the 18 year old, then re-sent, they were not original. What if the originator were a rich, white, male Neocon? Get the whole 'Rush to injustice'?
